Reading the tea leaves of iPad competitors

By Erica Ogg, CNET

(CNET) - It turns out APPLE isn't the only company readying a touch-screen tablet COMPUTER.

We say that half-jokingly, of course. In the last few months, quite a few companies have signaled their intentions to go head-to-head (or at least offer an alternative) to Apple's much-ballyhooed iPAD, which should hit stores in March.

Hewlett-Packard, Dell, Acer, and Sony have or are in the process of readying gadgets they say will compete with the iPad. We've seen some demonstrations at the Consumer Electronics Show and other trade shows, but several gadget makers admitted to waiting to see what Apple was going to do before setting the specifications and price of their competing touch-screen tablets.

Now that they know, what are they going to do about it? That might sound a bit silly considering companies like HP, Dell, and Acer have larger market share than APPLE-- when it comes to computers. But in other, faster-growing areas -- smartphones and music players -- Apple's popularity far outstrips theirs. And in a new device category (it's reasonable to consider this a new category) they're all essentially starting from scratch.

So how will every company not named Apple try to compete for your touch-screen tablet computing dollar, assuming such a dollar exists? They will try to emphasize something about theirs being better, of course, be it in terms of price, style, speeds and feeds, or the movies, books, games, or TV shows available via their gadget.

Dell, for example, providing evidence that an old dog can at least attempt new tricks, tends to emphasize style these days. HP's commercials try to sell you on how easily their product fit into your lifestyle.

More than anything, they should try to avoid selling it as a computer, in the classic laptop computer sense. If Dell and HP and Acer and their compatriots do that, they'll end up trying to convince people to spend money on basically yet another Netbook; something that's sort of like a PC, but not quite.

It's just smaller, cheaper, and with less functionality than a traditional PC. And after sophisticated smartphones and cheaper Netbooks, do consumers really need yet another device that's not quite a laptop?

Trying to sell it as a computer that has a touch screen is also unwise because all of these companies have, with some exceptions, been there, done that, and not done that terribly well.

Tablets, in the traditional sense, currently account for about 1 percent of the PC market, according to IDC. HP and Dell currently sell tablet computers, but to niches of customers: utility companies, police officers, insurance adjusters, and so on.

If the main group every consumer electronics company wants a piece of, mainstream consumers, have mostly resisted their entreaties that tablet computing (in the Microsoft sense) is the future, what would make them change their minds suddenly?

You can't say they haven't put a lot of thought into solving this issue. Dell says it's been looking at this category of device for two years; HP researchers have been working on improving touch-based devices in its labs for much longer than that. We can glean what direction it will go with its tablets based on the bits of information already out there. Read More

source: edition.cnn.com

How Apple became your parents

by Jason D. O'Grady

The App Store was purged of over 5,000 boobs, babes and bikini apps over the weekend in a move that shocked (and potentially bankrupted) hundreds of app developers while making puritans proud the world over.
I question why Apple chose this route instead of simply relying on the iPhone/iPod touch’s Parental Controls feature (pictured). It’s as simple as grabbing your kids device and going to Settings > General > Restrictions and checking the appropriate option.
Are we not trustworthy enough to use the devices that we give Apple our hard-earned cash for? Apparently not.
At least Apple’s argument over its ban of Flash from its handheld devices has some technical merit. Apple claims that Flash is buggy on Macs and that it would cut the iPad’s battery life to 1.5 hours. But still, shouldn’t you be able to enable Flash playback at your peril on a device that you own?
The answer is no. Apple needs to protect you from yourself.

Apple could even display a warning to the effect that “Flash is buggy and will drain your battery” when enabled. I’ve made this point before and stand by my thesis that Apple is being disingenuous about Flash. The real reason Apple won’t put Flash on its devices is because it’s a competitor to the App Store and would cut into its bottom line.
This makes Apple’s sexy app purge seem even more random and nonsensical. If Apple is truly concerned about App Store sales and by extension, shareholder value, why would it remove 3-5 percent of its apps on a weekend whim? Shouldn’t Apple encourage devs to create more apps so that it can get 30 percent of every sale? I guess business is so good at the App Store that it can afford to pick and choose who gets the tables at it’s little pocket flea market.
Every idiot walking knows that Apple’s banning of apps like Pocket Girlfriend and their ilk does nothing to stem the tide of racy content on the iPhone and iPod touch. Free porn has been available on the Internet since before Mozilla 1 and is available to anyone who taps on the Safari icon. And let’s not forget the scores of racy audiobooks, R Rated movies and porn podcasts that are available in iTunes.
Apple just created a huge double standard by banning 99% of apps containing any of the three B’s while still allow Playboy and Penthouse apps to remain for sale. Sports Illustrated is still allowed to shill its three (count ‘em) swimsuit apps but UK swimwear retailer Simply Beach had its shopping app swept up in the Apple raid over the weekend, costing them precious sales.

Read more at blogs.zdnet.com

iPhone’s Street Fighter IV detailed

Game to cost $9.99 and feature eight characters; Release set for March
Capcom’s iPhone adaptation of combo-heavy 2.5D brawler Street Fighter IV will be released on the App Store next month and will cost $9.99, the publisher has announced.
Speaking with GamePro, the company also confirmed that the game will feature just eight characters – less than half of the 19 that can be found in the main console release (that’s including hidden characters).

It will be interesting to see how Capcom deals with the thorny issue of converting the game’s famously complex and precise control system to the touch-screen device.
SFIV is just the latest big-name console franchise to make the move to Apple’s portable sensation, with the highest profile to date probably being Rockstar’s Grand Theft Auto: Chinatown Wars, which was released last month.

source: www.mcvuk.com by Ben Parfitt

Networks Wary of Apple’s Push to Cut Show Prices

If Apple cut the price of each TV episode in half — to 99 cents, from $1.99 — would sales on iTunes increase enough to offset the price drop?
Experiments are under way to find out, and the head of the nation’s No. 1 television network, CBS, indicated last week that some shows, at least, would be priced under a dollar in the future.

Apple wants to ignite TV show sales, especially as it prepares to introduce the iPad tablet computer next month. But its proposals to lower prices across the board are being met by skepticism from the major networks.

Television production is expensive, and the networks are wary of selling shows for less. They are equally wary of harming their far more lucrative deals with affiliates and cable distributors, who may feel threatened by online storefronts like Apple’s and those operated by Amazon, Microsoft and Sony.

But the networks do not want to ignore the 125 million customers with credit cards who have iTunes accounts, either. “We’re willing to try anything, but the key word is ‘try,’ ” said a TV network executive who requested anonymity because his company had declined to comment publicly on talks with Apple.

With the iTunes pricing debate, the television industry is facing the same question that music labels and publishers are: just how much is our content worth in a digital world?

It is especially complicated for TV, given that most people already pay for TV through their cable or satellite service — and they can watch most network shows free on streaming sites like Hulu, albeit with advertisements.

Read More at www.nytimes.com

Apple Gets Strict on Adult Apps

Apple removes apps deemed too racy

Anyone who uses an iPhone and has perused the most popular apps on the free side of the App Store has likely noticed that many of them most popular apps are adult in nature. For a long time Apple would not allow adult or pornographic apps onto the App Store, but it relaxed that policy over the last several months.

The Wall Street Journal reports that Apple has begun enforcing a more strict policy on adult apps than it has previously according to a person familiar with the matter. Apple has reportedly already removed the raciest of the adult oriented apps from the App Store. Two of the apps that have been removed include one that animates parts of women in photos and one for fans of a porn star.

Apple said in a statement, "If we find these apps contain inappropriate material, we remove them and request the developer make any necessary changes in order to be distributed by Apple."

According to Mac Rumors, 4,000 adult-themed apps were removed on Friday alone by Apple. ChilliFresh goes even deeper into the removals claiming that Apple's new restrictions ban “Images of women in bikinis” and that “No apps will be approved that in any way imply sexual content”.

The App Store clean up is thought to be part of housekeeping ahead of the launch of the iPad. Apps for the iPad and iPhone will operate on either platform and are expected to be a big part of the success of the iPad when it launches.

Apple has previously sparked controversy for approving the baby shaker app only to come back and remove it after complaints.

source: dailytech.com

Apple to take iPad orders this week?

Want a the 3G-less Apple iPad? The Mac maker will begin taking advance orders for the product later this week, it has been claimed.
The news comes from website AppAdvice - formerly AppleiPhoneApps.com - and is said to derive from "a reliable source... familiar with the matter".
Said mole says Apple's online store will begin taking iPad orders on 25 February.
Only US customers will be offered the product on that day, he or she continues, and only the non-3G model will be included. Shipments should follow in around 30 days. Apple said "late March", when the device was announced late in January.
The Wi-Fi only iPad will come in 16, 32 and 64GB incarnations priced at $499, $599 and $699, respectively. That's £323-452 at the current Dollar-Sterling exchange rate, but UK pricing has not yet been announced. Maybe later this week...
The 3G iPad will come in the same choice of capacities but cost $629-829 (£407-536).
source: www.reghardware.co.uk

Will Apple change the face of video sales as it has done for music?

Apple already features video on its iTunes online store and made an initial foray into the television market with its Apple TV box. You can watch programmes on the iPhone, but its new, bigger brother – the flashy new iPad tablet – is eminently suitable for video.
Apple chief executive Steve Jobs says the iPad is "YouTube in high-def" and that it is "awesome to watch TV shows and movies on", yet the iPad is not widescreen, nor does it display high-definition nor does it support Flash video, a widely used onlinevideo format.
As Paul Lee of Deloitte points out, the iPad "complements rather than competes with the traditional television screen".
Apple is keen to establish a lower price point and a subscription model for television programmes on the iPad, much as it did with the iPod and iTunes. Reportedly, the company is negotiating with television networks such as CBS Corp and Walt Disney, which owns ABC, for a monthly "best-of-TV" subscription service, although no content deals have been announced.
"I don't see the iPad as a game changer for video," says Michael Comish, chief executive of online video provider Blinkbox. "Apple will not dominate movie and television distribution the way they dominate music."
Nevertheless, the iPad has many enthusiasts, including actor and technology enthusiast Stephen Fry who described the iPad as "soul scorchingly beautiful" to use.

source: guardian.co.uk